Articles

Agile empowers teams to make decisions and take ownership of their work, fostering a culture of accountability and collaboration. This leads to higher productivity and innovation. Agile also encourages collaboration across different functions, breaking down silos and enhancing communication and cooperation among team members.

In Scrum, team empowerment is fundamental to its success. By fostering self-organizing teams, Scrum enables members to take ownership of tasks, make collaborative decisions, and innovate solutions. This empowerment enhances motivation, creativity, and accountability within the team, leading to higher productivity and quality outcomes. Scrum's iterative approach encourages continuous improvement and adaptability, empowering teams to respond swiftly to changes in requirements or market conditions. Through daily stand-ups, sprint planning, and retrospectives, Scrum reinforces a culture of trust and transparency, where each team member contributes meaningfully to achieving project goals.

Scrum framework is being used as a successful Project Management or Product Management process in many organizations. It’s been gaining in popularity over the last 15 years, as more and more organizations realize the benefits of Scrum. But before a particular team/organization embraces Scrum or any other Agile process, the biggest hindrance comes from the management, which is generally resistant to change, even in the face of evidence. Let’s look at some of the cultural challenges and how to overcome them:

Independent Decision Making: Scrum encourages independent thinking and decision-making, while in most corporate structure, a top-down process of decision making takes places. Also, the larger the organization more the hierarchies, and independent decision-making becomes that much more difficult. To overcome this problem, senior management buy-in is a must, and they have to be convinced of the benefits of religiously following Scrum as a practice.

Customer Relationship: Generally, a traditional vendor-supplier relationship between the organization and the client will not augur well for practicing Scrum. Customers have to get much more involved with the development team, and periodic feedback becomes the norm rather than the exception. Here again, the client can appreciate the effort being put in by the development team, if they are closely involved in the planning of the backlog and sprint items.

Quality Philosophy: In a traditional structure, quality teams focus a lot on metrics, charts, graphs, etc., while Scrum lays emphasis on the Collaborative Approach. Every member of the Scrum team takes the responsibility of bringing in Quality in the development process, and every member contributes to Quality and Process Improvement. Basically, this change of approach means delegating authority, which may face stiff resistance from QA and Testing managers.

Sustainable Pace of Development: In the traditional process, testing and bug fixing happen during the last few weeks of the project phase, wherein everyone from the developers to the technical architects to the testers works overtime and during weekends to complete the task. Agile on the other hand is all about a sustainable pace of development, wherein every sprint, the code will be developed and tested.