Articles

How does the Retrospect Sprint Meeting contribute to the 'inspect-adapt' aspect of Scrum? It's a crucial part of the Scrum framework, serving as the final step in a Sprint. It's a dedicated time at the end of each sprint where the Scrum team reflects on what went well, what could be improved, and how to make those improvements happen.

All Scrum Team members attend the meeting, which is facilitated or moderated by the Scrum Master. It is recommended, but not required for the Product Owner to attend. One team member acts as the scribe and documents discussions and items for future action. It is essential to hold this meeting in an open and relaxed environment to encourage full participation by all team members. Discussions in the Retrospect Sprint Meeting encompass both what went wrong and what went right.

The primary objectives of the meeting are to identify three specific things:

1. Things the team needs to keep doing: best practices
2. Things the team needs to begin doing: process improvements
3. Things the team needs to stop doing: process problems and bottlenecks
4. These areas are discussed and a list of Agreed Actionable Improvements is created.

Other tools used in the Process of Retrospect Sprint are:

1. ESVP
2. Speed Boat
3. Metrics and Measuring Techniques
4. Scrum Guidance Body Expertise

The outputs of the Retrospect Sprint are:

1. Agreed Actionable Improvements
2. Assigned Action Items and Due Dates
3. Proposed Non-Functional Items for Prioritized Product Backlog
4. Retrospect Sprint Log(s)
5. Scrum Team Lessons Learned
6. Updated Scrum Guidance Body Recommendations

How does the Retrospect Sprint Meeting contribute to the 'inspect-adapt' aspect of Scrum? It's a crucial part of the Scrum framework, serving as the final step in a Sprint. It's a dedicated time at the end of each sprint where the Scrum team reflects on what went well, what could be improved, and how to make those improvements happen.

All Scrum Team members attend the meeting, which is facilitated or moderated by the Scrum Master. It is recommended, but not required for the Product Owner to attend. One team member acts as the scribe and documents discussions and items for future action. It is essential to hold this meeting in an open and relaxed environment to encourage full participation by all team members. Discussions in the Retrospect Sprint Meeting encompass both what went wrong and what went right.

The primary objectives of the meeting are to identify three specific things:

1. Things the team needs to keep doing: best practices
2. Things the team needs to begin doing: process improvements
3. Things the team needs to stop doing: process problems and bottlenecks
4. These areas are discussed and a list of Agreed Actionable Improvements is created.

Other tools used in the Process of Retrospect Sprint are:

1. ESVP
2. Speed Boat
3. Metrics and Measuring Techniques
4. Scrum Guidance Body Expertise

The outputs of the Retrospect Sprint are:

1. Agreed Actionable Improvements
2. Assigned Action Items and Due Dates
3. Proposed Non-Functional Items for Prioritized Product Backlog
4. Retrospect Sprint Log(s)
5. Scrum Team Lessons Learned
6. Updated Scrum Guidance Body Recommendations

The Product Backlog Management Skills Training Initiative is a comprehensive program designed to equip professionals with the essential skills required to effectively manage product backlogs. Drawing insights from the SBOK Guide, this initiative encompasses a wide array of topics including backlog grooming techniques, prioritization strategies, and stakeholder engagement methodologies. Participants will delve into the intricacies of refining product backlog items, ensuring alignment with stakeholder needs and organizational objectives. Through interactive workshops, case studies, and practical exercises, attendees will hone their ability to maintain a dynamic and prioritized backlog, fostering agility and responsiveness within their teams.This initiative empowers individuals to optimize product development processes, driving value delivery and customer satisfaction.

The Program Product Owner develops the Program Product Backlog which contains a prioritized list of high level business and project requirements preferably written in the form of large Program Backlog Items. These are later refined by the Product Owners of individual projects as they create and prioritize Product Backlogs for their projects. These Prioritized Product Backlogs have much smaller but detailed User Stories that can be approved, estimated, and committed by individual Scrum Teams.

The Program Product Backlog is continuously refined by the Program Product Owner to ensure that new business requirements are added and existing requirements are properly documented and prioritized. This ensures that the most valuable requirements in meeting the program’s objectives are prioritized as high and the remaining are given a lower priority.

The Program Product Backlog created for the program presents a larger picture of all projects that are part of the program. Therefore, it can provide significant guidance regarding project goals, scope, objectives, and the expected business benefits.

Similar to the Project Product Backlog, the Program Product Backlog may also undergo periodic refining to incorporate changes and new requirements. Changes to the Program Product Backlog can result from changes in either external or internal conditions. External conditions might include changing business scenarios, technology trends, or legal compliance requirements. Internal factors affecting the Program Product Backlog could be related to modifications in organizational strategy or policies, Identified Risks and other factors. Changes in requirements in the Program Product Backlog often impact the Project Product Backlogs of underlying projects, so they should be taken into account during the Refine Prioritized Product Backlog process.

SCRUMstudy presents a thorough Scrum Certification Classroom Training program crafted to offer a profound grasp of Scrum principles and methodologies. Guided by seasoned instructors, these engaging sessions guarantee participants acquire practical insights and hands-on practice. The curriculum encompasses crucial Scrum fundamentals such as roles, events, and artifacts, equipping attendees for certification assessments. Through active participation, both individuals and teams can elevate their Agile competencies, refine project execution, and bolster their contributions to organizational success.

The Scaled Scrum Master Certification (SSMC™) Online, is designed for Scrum professionals who aim to extend their expertise in scaling Scrum across multiple teams and complex projects. This certification equips practitioners with advanced skills to coordinate, manage, and implement Scrum processes effectively at an enterprise level. The SSMC™ curriculum covers essential topics such as managing distributed teams, synchronizing multiple Scrum teams, and handling intricate project dynamics, ensuring that participants can drive agile transformation and deliver substantial business value in large-scale environments.

The Scaled Scrum Master is a premier certification for Scrum Masters operating within large-scale Agile environments. This program equips professionals with the knowledge and skills necessary to manage multiple Scrum teams, coordinate large projects, and ensure alignment with enterprise goals.

The importance of Scaled Scrum Master Certification cannot be overstated in today's complex, large-scale project environments. This certification equips Scrum Masters with advanced skills and knowledge to effectively coordinate multiple Scrum teams working towards a unified goal. Organizations benefit from reduced project risks, improved efficiency, and higher agility, making Scaled Scrum Master Certification a crucial asset for driving successful outcomes in expansive, multifaceted projects.

The Scrum Master Certified  Meetup was a dynamic gathering of agile enthusiasts and certified Scrum Masters eager to exchange insights and experiences. Held in a collaborative atmosphere, the meetup featured engaging discussions on best practices in Scrum framework implementation, overcoming common challenges in agile project management, and fostering team empowerment. Participants shared valuable case studies, practical tips, and innovative approaches that highlighted the role of the Scrum Master in enabling teams to achieve high-performance and deliver value iteratively. Overall, the meetup provided a platform for networking, learning, and deepening expertise in agile methodologies, reinforcing the commitment to continuous improvement and excellence in Scrum practices.

SCRUMstudy Training Meetups provide an invaluable platform for agile enthusiasts, practitioners, and professionals to come together, share experiences, and learn from each other. These meetups serve as informal gatherings where members of the agile community can connect, collaborate, and discuss various topics related to Scrum and Agile methodologies. Whether it's sharing success stories, discussing challenges, or exploring new trends, SCRUMstudy Training Meetups offer a supportive environment for knowledge exchange and networking. Attendees benefit from hearing diverse perspectives, gaining insights from experienced practitioners, and building relationships with like-minded individuals. These meetups foster a sense of community and camaraderie among agile enthusiasts, contributing to continuous learning and growth within the industry.

One of the major misconceptions or criticisms about Scrum is that it cannot be used to deliver large scale projects that have multiple large teams which are not collocated. And for Scrum to be effective, the teams should ideally be collocated and have six to ten members. However, this is not valid as Scrum can easily be scaled for effective use in large projects. In situations where the Scrum Team size exceeds ten people, multiple Scrum Teams can be formed to work on the project.

Complex projects with numerous large teams working in parallel make it necessary to synchronize and facilitate the flow of information and enhance communication for the project to be successful. Scrum uses one of its events or ceremonies to overcome this barrier, i.e., Scrum of Scrums (SoS) meeting. This meeting is usually facilitated by the Chief Scrum Master and is intended to focus on areas of coordination and integration between the different Scrum Teams.

SoS is a review meeting for all the Scrum teams involved in the project. The main purpose of this meeting is to communicate progress among multiple teams. Scrum Master from all teams attend this meet. The meeting is most effective when the Chief Scrum Master announces the agenda prior to the meeting. This prepares the participants to gather appropriate information and issues to be discussed.

Any impediments being faced by a team which may also affect other teams are brought up in this meeting. Teams get an overall view of the development of the project and redirect their efforts meaningfully. This review meeting plays a crucial role in identifying risks and change requirements of each team which in turn affects other teams’ line of work. This also brings to the forefront any production duplications that may occur because of the scale of the project. An impediment log is created stating internal and external impediments. This log helps in resolving issues systematically.

The Chief Scrum Master (or another Scrum Master who facilitates the Scrum of Scrum Meetings) is responsible for ensuring that all representatives have an environment conducive to openly and honestly sharing information, including feedback to other team representatives. This conducive environment plays a vital role in better communication and identification of important issues. It contributes greatly to the success of the project as a whole. The Chief Scrum Master should take care that all representatives speak their minds and do not reserve their issues and concerns which may later turn out to be costly. Updates are provided in the form of answers to four specific questions:

• What has my team been working on since the last meeting?
• What will my team do until the next meeting?
• What were other teams counting on our team to finish that remains undone?
• What is our team planning on doing that might affect other teams?

When these four questions are answered, following outcomes are achieved leading to successful project delivery: reduction in non-detection of risks, enhanced coordination among teams, continuous improvement, maintaining of team’s focus on achievement of project objectives, and reduction in need for redesign and rework.

Thus, a SoS is held to coordinate the interdependencies between the related projects. It may then be conducted to coordinate and manage dependencies across all projects.

Acceptance Criteria are the objective components by which a User Story’s functionality is judged and are developed by the Product Owner according to his or her expert understanding of the customer’s requirements. Acceptance Criteria should outline the conditions that User Stories must satisfy. At the end of each Sprint, the Product Owner uses these Criteria to verify the completed deliverables and can either accept or reject individual deliverables and their associated user stories. Good acceptance criteria should include the characteristic of Usability, Performance, Functionality, Error handling and Stress tests

Clearly defined Acceptance Criteria are crucial for timely and effective delivery of the functionality defined in the User Stories, which ultimately determines the success of the project. It is a challenge for Scrum Product Owner to come up with and describe the boundaries of User Stories based on limited information.

Product Owner’s decision making is based on ways looking for safe solutions (principles of satisficing), the information and the time they have to make decisions. That is, their decision-making strategy attempts to meet an acceptability threshold rather than finding the best option available. They do not stick to make optimized decisions.

Scrum projects operate in Time-boxed Sprints and due to time constraints it is not always possible to provide a detailed list of criteria that will cover the User story as a whole. Therefore, Product Owner comes up with a list that is good enough to move the sprint ahead.

Product Owner begins conversations with the customer and stakeholders for outlining specific requirements as they pertain to the proposed product or service and begin the search for the optimal list of Acceptance Criteria. But in reality, the Product Owner identifies a list of criteria which is highly visible and not comprehensive or exhaustive. Once the list is identified, the product owner discusses them with the team. Review begins with alternatives, differing a little from the current choice of list, along with the team and it continues until the product owner identifies an alternative that meets acceptable level of performance.

Constituting an exhaustive list for Acceptance Criteria is not mandatory but they should be sufficient to move the sprint forward. Acceptance Criteria are limited by time and they do not add internal value to the future product.

Role of Acceptance Criteria in maintaining quality is critical and needs to be clearly understood by the team members. User Stories should be able to ignite ideas in team members so that presence of a detailed list of criteria covering all aspects is no longer being required.

The Sprint Retrospective holds significant importance within the Scrum framework, serving as a dedicated opportunity for the team to reflect on their performance and identify areas for improvement. This meeting, held at the end of each Sprint, allows team members to collectively review their processes, practices, and interactions during the iteration. By fostering open communication and collaboration, the retrospective encourages team members to share their observations, insights, and suggestions for enhancing their effectiveness. Through this reflective process, teams can uncover strengths to reinforce and weaknesses to address, leading to continuous improvement in subsequent Sprints.

Retrospect Sprint

In this process, the Scrum Master and Scrum Team meet to discuss the lessons learned throughout the Sprint. This information is documented as lessons learned which will be applied to future Sprints. As a result, there may be agreed actionable improvements or updated Scrum Guidance Body Recommendations. This process is an essential component of the continuous improvement in Scrum. Agreed actionable improvements are the primary output of the Retrospect Sprint process. This is a list of actionable items that the team has come up with to address problems and improve processes in order to enhance team performance in future Sprints. Once the agreed actionable improvements have been elaborated and refined, action items to implement the improvements may be assigned by the Scrum Team and each action item will have a defined due date for completion. The Retrospect Sprint Log is a record of the opinions, discussions, and actionable items raised in a Retrospect Sprint Meeting. The Scrum Master usually facilitates creation of this log with input from Scrum Core Team members. The collection of all Retrospective Sprint Logs becomes the project diary, which includes details on project successes, issues, problems, and resolutions. These logs are public documents available to anyone in the organization. 

Following the two processes of the Review and Retrospect phase helps those involved in a Scrum project to review deliverables and identify impediments to neutralize in the future. Remember that the processes do not need to be performed sequentially or separately. They can be adjusted to complement the specific requirements of each project. Before leaving the Review and Retrospect phase, however, it is imperative to analyze the project and determine what worked and what didn’t work.

Primary Objectives of the Meeting are to Identify three Specific Things:

1. Things the team needs to keep doing: best practices
2. Things the team needs to begin doing: process improvements
3. Things the team needs to stop doing: process problems and bottlenecks

Other tools used in the Process of Retrospect Sprint are:

1. ESVP
2. Speed Boat
3. Metrics and Measuring Techniques
4. Scrum Guidance Body Expertise

The outputs of the Retrospect Sprint are:

1. Agreed Actionable Improvements
2. Assigned Action Items and Due Dates
3. Proposed Non-Functional Items for Prioritized Product Backlog
4. Retrospect Sprint Log(s)
5. Scrum Team Lessons Learned
6. Updated Scrum Guidance Body Recommendations

How is the Retrospect Sprint Meeting Related to the ‘Inspect-adapt’ Aspect of Scrum?

The Retrospect Sprint Meeting is an important element of the ‘inspect-adapt’ Scrum framework and it is the final step in a Sprint. All Scrum Team members attend the meeting, which is facilitated or moderated by the Scrum Master. It is recommended, but not required for the Product Owner to attend. One team member acts as the scribe and documents discussions and items for future action. It is essential to hold this meeting in an open and relaxed environment to encourage full participation by all team members. Discussions in the Retrospect Sprint Meeting encompass both what went wrong and what went right.

Agile and Scrum certifications hold significant importance in the realm of project management and software development. These certifications validate professionals' understanding and proficiency in Agile methodologies, particularly Scrum, which emphasizes iterative development, collaboration, and adaptability. Achieving certification not only demonstrates a foundational knowledge of Agile principles but also signifies a commitment to continuous improvement and delivering value to stakeholders efficiently. Employers increasingly value certified Agile and Scrum practitioners for their ability to lead teams, manage complex projects with agility, and foster innovation in dynamic environments. Ultimately, these certifications serve as a benchmark of competence and enhance career prospects in the competitive landscape of modern business and technology sectors.

The Agile and Scrum certification process, involves a structured approach to gaining proficiency in Scrum methodologies and practices. Candidates typically start by choosing a relevant certification, such as Scrum Master, Product Owner, or Scrum Developer, offered by SCRUMstudy. The process usually begins with preparatory coursework or self-study using the SBOK Guide, which provides comprehensive coverage of Scrum principles, roles, events, and artifacts. Following the preparatory phase, candidates must pass an exam that assesses their understanding and practical application of Scrum concepts. The certification exams often include multiple-choice questions and may require the demonstration of hands-on experience through case studies or practical projects. Successfully obtaining a certification signifies a validated level of expertise and a commitment to the Agile philosophy, enhancing one's ability to contribute effectively to Scrum teams and projects.

SCRUMstudy offers comprehensive Scrum Certification Classroom Training designed to provide an in-depth understanding of Scrum principles and practices. Led by experienced instructors, these interactive sessions ensure participants gain practical knowledge and hands-on experience. The training covers essential Scrum concepts, including roles, events, and artifacts, and prepares attendees for certification exams. By participating, individuals and teams can enhance their Agile skills, improve project delivery, and contribute more effectively to their organizations.

Scrum Certification Professional Development focuses on enhancing skills and knowledge in Scrum, a popular Agile framework for managing complex projects. It involves earning certifications most popular being Scrum Master Certified (SMC) and Scrum Product Owner Certified (SPOC). These certifications validate one's expertise in Scrum principles, practices, and methodologies. Professional development in this field includes attending workshops, participating in training courses, engaging in practical Scrum projects, and continuous learning through reading and community involvement. It aims to improve one's ability to facilitate, implement, and optimize Scrum processes, leading to more efficient project delivery and higher quality outcomes.

It is often seen that Agile has been implemented successfully in different projects. But when it comes to Product Management or NPD (New Product Development), many people get sceptical regarding implementation of Agile. Now it has to be understood that Agile is not a methodology which can be used in a cookie cutter way across any organization. A lot of tweaking and customization is required to make it work. So, in product management, a proper assessment is required to see if Agile implementation will improve performance or not.

Here also, we need to see if the following two criteria are being fulfilled or not:

1. Requirement Volatility : It is important to identify the volatility of requirements and whether working in Sprint will actually improve customer satisfaction, reduce uncertainty and help PM teams become more productive or not. If requirements are fixed in sand and are not dynamic in nature, it will not make any marked improvement even if the teams work in sprint. Also, Agile Product Life Cycle Management involves a lot of new learning, so it needs to be checked if the team will be comfortable in this transition or not.
2. Frequent customer Interaction: External customers are big stakeholders in any Agile effort. In many product management scenarios, we have seen that customers just give their specifications and just go away for months and months. And finally when they come back for the product, it is completely different from what they expected, because market dynamics change and the expectations change as well. So the biggest benefit is actually to the customers themselves, and this is what the PM team should explain in details to the customers so as to get their buy in. Without their pro-active support, it will not be possible to implement Agile in any way.

If we are talking about New Product Development, then Agile actually becomes even more crucial and important.  That is because neither the customers nor the PM team has any benchmark to follow. So, frequent discussions and brain storming sessions followed by change in requirements or prototypes will be mandatory for successful NPD. So, it is important to realize that Agile can be implemented successfully in Product Management as well, provided it is understood properly and used in the proper context. Also, management buy-in and customer buy-in are important components in this scenario, and a good AGILE coach will also be very beneficial.

Scrum certification is crucial for demonstrating expertise in agile project management. It validates your ability to implement Scrum practices, enhancing team collaboration and productivity. Recognized globally, it opens career opportunities, boosts credibility, and ensures adherence to industry standards, driving successful project outcomes in a competitive business environment.

We will attempt to do a quick overview of some of the Scrum certifications that are currently being offered.

Then, we will talk about figuring out the right trainer. It is beneficial to find a Scrum trainer with the background as yours however it is not an absolute requirement. The framework and the style of the Scrum training can vary from trainer to trainer, so you should try to figure out which one suits your learning style.

The biggest positive of a formal Scrum training is that you learn everything in a controlled environment. You meet people who are also there to learn about Scrum and in case you have common background, it helps to understand the process and difficulties of implementation from outsider’s point of view. A formal training also helps you understand about the mistake which you may make due to the traditional project management concepts rooted in you.

The main purpose of any certification is to impart a common baseline of the knowledge. These Scrum certifications, compared to any other project management certifications have a very easy test. You should remember that getting a Scrum certificate is way easier than the implementing actual Scrum framework.

Scrum framework/Agile methodology in general gives you a lot of freedom in how you implement it. However you should avoid changing the essence of the whole process. These project managers are commonly referred as Scrumbut. The common suggestion is that you start to implement Scrum as-is until you understand it properly and then decide for yourself what you might want to change. After a while you may find that you don’t need to change anything at all.

You need to understand that nothing is more valuable than experience. Scrum or Agile Certification may only add some credibility and marketability to the individual.

As more and more companies are adopting Scrum as preferred project management method over traditional waterfall method, the subject of mapping of the roles is becoming more critical. Probably one of the biggest challenges organizations face when they move to Scrum is where does a Project Manager fit in Scrum?

We are so used to the role of Project Manager that we often forget that it is merely a role which does not specify a position in an organizational hierarchy. The term ‘project manager’ has become so obvious that in organizational set up also people are permanently designated as Project Manager in many organizations. We have to understand the fact that project manager is not a permanent designation in an organization but a role of person in a particular project when he manages that project. A person may have necessary skillsets to manage a project but is not a project manager in that project until he plays the role of the same. The role of a project manager is defined by the responsibilities performed in that project and a named individual (Project Manager) just plays the role. While transitioning to Scrum from Waterfall, we often do the mistake of trying to fit in a named individual (the Project Manager) into different Scrum Roles. Do not try fit in a Project Manager in Scrum project management setup; rather you should map the roles and responsibilities of a traditional project manager with Scrum roles and responsibilities and accordingly a named individual will play the role as per his skillset.

People often try to find synergy between the roles of a traditional Project Manager with that of a Scrum Master. In practice, both are very different. A traditional Waterfall Project Manager works as a manager or leader for the project. He plans, makes decisions and manages the project and is accountable for accomplishing the project objectives. On the other hand, the Scrum Master only works as a facilitator and he or she is at the same hierarchical level as anyone else in the Scrum team. Any person who learns to facilitate Scrum projects can become the Scrum Master for a project or for a sprint.

The duties and responsibilities of a traditional Project Manager have been divided among all the three core roles in a Scrum project. The Guide to the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOKTM) has captured the differences of traditional project management roles and Scrum roles very nicely.