Articles

In large organizational contexts, implementing Scrum can be both a challenge and an opportunity for enhancing agility and collaboration. The SBOK Guide emphasizes the importance of scaling Scrum practices to align with complex structures and diverse teams across various departments. Successful adoption requires fostering a culture that embraces iterative development, promoting cross-functional teams, and ensuring effective communication channels. Organizations must also adapt their governance frameworks to support Scrum principles while maintaining alignment with business goals. By leveraging frameworks, large organizations can effectively integrate Scrum, ensuring that teams remain agile and responsive to changing market demands while delivering value consistently.

The success of today’s organizations depends on how well they can adapt to the hurricane of changes sweeping across their industry. How can they do this? Many organizations are looking to Agile as the answer.

In spite of its popularity, Agile has not been warmly embraced by large organizations. One of the obvious reasons for this is that large organizations do not undertake major changes unless absolutely necessary. Another reason  is related to the fact that Agile is different from traditional project management philosophies from the roots to the leaves. Large organizations are quite orthodox when it comes to their organizational structures and management. Successful implementation of Agile in a bureaucratic environment is extremely difficult, because one of the core foundations of Agile is continuous process improvement, while moribund bureaucracy stakes its survival on the illusion of process stability. However, big organizations are beginning to be attracted by the importance and success rate of Agile. Software conglomerates such as Microsoft, IBM and SAP are successfully implementing Agile for select product development projects.

For Agile to be successful, an organization has to decide that it is ready to implement Agile’s core principles. It has to break free of its rigid ways to embrace the Agile culture. It is essential for a company to understand the conditions in which the implementation of Agile will lead to success:

Condition 1: A small team working in one location, instead of a large team operating from different locations
Condition 2: Short and frequent iterations during which problems can be identified faster than in extensive project cycles which tend to hide issues until the very end of the project
Condition 3: The project includes customer involvement during the project development. If the company is strict about a bureaucratic and form ridden route to get to the customer, Agile will hobbled by the same red tape.
Condition 4: Empowering the team to take decisions about development is a necessary component of achieving success in Agile methodology. Agile will fall flat, if the company believes in a rigid hierarchy of decision making.
Condition 5: Agile stresses working the software instead of documenting the codes, which can be done later. If the company has to rely on extensive documentation for audits, then Agile may provide less than the desired process improvements.

These conditions are not stated to warn or scare large companies from adopting Agile. They are stated to prevent companies from blindly and partially adopting Agile and then complaining that Agile does not work. Any large organization must take into account its immediate business needs and available resources, and understand clearly what exactly it desires to achieve. Then the executives of the organization should decide whether to adopt the Agile methodology totally or take a pragmatic approach. Whatever decision they take, unwavering and holistic executive support is one of the primary requirements for Agile to work in a large organization.